Name: Lorraine Fleck
Company: Hoffer Adler LLP
@lorrainefleck @HofferAdler
Lorraine is a trademark lawyer at Hoffler Adler LLP. She visited us to give us some information about copyright and how it applies to our work. All written content in this post was taken from the slides she provided to us.
What is Copyright?
The exclusive right to reproduce original content and stop others from reproducing that content. Means that you must get others permission to use their content unless your activity falls within an exception to infringement. Applies to the Internet! The laws in Canada and the US can differ dramatically.
What Does Copyright Protect?
Original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works.
- Literary works include books, pamphlets, magazines, newspapers, tables, computer programs, compilations of literary works
- Dramatic works include choreography, written music, movies, and musical plays
- Audible musical works include music with or without words
- Artistic works include paintings, drawings, maps, charts, plans, photos, engravings, sculpture, crafts, and architectural works such as buildings, sculptures and models
How is Copyright Created?
- The original work is created by a Canadian citizen or citizen of a Berne Convention country
- The work must come into physical existence; copyright does not exist in ideas
- If the work is published, the work is published in Canada or a Berne Convention country
- No need to register or mark (e.g. © 2012, Lorraine M. Fleck)
- Registration is a rebuttable assumption of copyright that can be useful for litigation purposes
- Best to register early; Canadian courts are skeptical of registrations obtained shortly before or during a lawsuit
How Long Does Copyright Exist?
Depends on the type of work and whether there are joint authors. For example:
- Most works: Life of the author + Rest of the calendar year in which the author died + 50 years
- Joint authors: Term lasts to the end of the 50th year of the last author dies
- Unknown author: Lesser of the end of the 50th year after publication OR 75 years after the work was made
- Photographs: To the end of the 50th year from the making of the initial negative
- Movies: To the end of the 50th year from first publication and if not published, 50 years from the making of the movie
- Sound recordings: 50 years from when first recorded
- Broadcasters: 50 years from communication
Who Owns Copyright?
Usually the person who creates the copyright work but there are exceptions:
- Photographs: The first person who owns the negative of the photo (not always the photographer)
- Employees: Employees are the first owner of works created for the employer by the employee
Who Can Use Copyright Materials?
- The owner. Ownership can be transferred, but must be in writing. The ownership transfer agreement usually is called an "assignment".
- Anyone who has permission ("license"). The terms of the license dictate what the "licensee" can do under the license. The fee paid under the license to the copyright owner ("licensor") is a "royalty".
- Each site has its own terms governing content use
- Many sites only allow non-commercial use
- Commercial licenses are often restricted e.g. number of copies, territory
- Read license terms carefully
- Know how the content will be used before purchasing a license to avoid wasted $$$
What is Copyright Infringement?
- The making of an unauthorized copy
- There must be a "substantial" portion of the material copied
- No hard and fast rule as to what is substantial
- Test is quality, not quantity: Does the copy take enough of the work so as to convey at least a portion of the value of the work?
Two types:
- Primary: A copy is made without permission (e.g. copying most of a magazine article, pirated software)
- Secondary: The sale, rental or distribution, or display or possession for that purpose, of an unauthorized copy provided the person in possession of the copy knows it was an infringing copy (e.g. bootleg DVD stores, file sharing)
Are There Exceptions to Copyright Infringement?
- Yes, but under specific circumstances
- Major category is "fair dealing": Research/private study, Criticism/review, News reporting
- While not limited to private or non-commercial contexts, not very useful for advertisers. No advertising specific exception.
- Parody is NOT currently an exception in Canada
What factors are used to assess what is "fair" in the context of "fair dealing"?
- Purpose
- Character
- Amount
- Nature (of the work)
- Available alternatives
- Effect (of the dealing on the work)
What are Moral Rights?
The author's right to:
- Retain the integrity of the work;
- Not have her/his work distorted;
- Have his/her name associated or not associated with the work
Activities must be shown to be to the detriment of author's honour/reputation.
- Cannot be transferred, but can be waived
- Can prevent you from altering content or prevent your content from being altered, unless there is a waiver
- Term is the same as copyright in the work
Bill C-11 Highlights
- The Copyright Modernization Act is the fourth attempt at reform since 2005
- Canada's copyright act has not been significantly amended since 1997
- Some of the significant changes that affect those in web design and advertising include: The "mash-up" exception, changes in statutory damages, exceptions for parody and satire
Bill C-11 Hightlight: Mash-Ups
- Infringement exception for non-commercial user generated content created using copyright material legitimately obtained by the creator
- Applies to non-commercial uses only
- Could affect the market for the works used to create the mash-up (e.g. translations, sequels)
Bill C-11 Hightlight: Statutory Damages
- Would cap statutory damages against individuals who infringe copyright for non-commercial purposes to $100 - $5,000 for all works in the lawsuit
- Currently, statutory damages are $500 - $20,000 per copy
- May result in less deterrence for large scale infringers
Bill C-11 Hightlight: Parody & Satire
- Most relevent for web design and advertising
- Parody: The original work is ridiculed
- Satire: Use of the original work to mock someone else
- No need to identify source/author as for criticism/review and news/reporting
- While parody and satire exceptions will give those in advertising more tools to create content, they still need to be careful
- Parody and satire may infringe trade-marks and result in defamation
- Use of content must be "fair": do not use too much and avoid impacting existing opportunities for content owner to exploit copyright
Can you use a copyrighted image if the image is no longer recognizable?
Depends. No if the alteration impacts the ability of the copyright owner to exploit the work. Even if that is not the case, if the distortion negatively affects the creator's honor / reputation, then no because the distortion would affect the author's moral rights.
What happens if you are accused of using copyrighted material? What are some of the consequences and how should you approach resolving this matter?
Usually, the plaintiff's lawyer will send a demand letter. If the matter cannot be resolved at that stage, the copyright owner may sue. The limitation period is three years. Criminal proceedings are also available, bur rare.
Remedies for copyright infringement include:
- An injunction. The only available remedy if an infringer can prove (s)he had not reasonable basis for knowing copyright existed/was infringed
- Damages and profits or statutory damages (currently $500 to $20,000 per copy)
- Interest, punitive and /or exemplary damages, "delivery up" of infringing materials and "costs" (payment of plaintiff's legal fees)
A copyright dispute can be very expensive money- and time-wise, with each party's legal fees easily exceeding $100,000 or more, and a lawsuit in Federal Court currently taking two years to reach judgement. Proceedings in Ontario Supreme Court can take considerably longer to go to trial.
When blogging about other people's work and wanting to post images we find online, is there a hard and fast rule about how we should credit the original author? What should we be wary of when doing this?
OK if doing for criticism/review or news reporting, provided you credit the author by mentioning:
- The source; and
- if giving the source, the name of the author (in the case of a work); performer (in the case of a sound recording); or broadcaster (in the case of a communication signal)
Otherwise, an infringement, even if the author is mentioned and the above information is provided.
How can we best protect our own work that we post online that might get picked up by other people?
Some tips:
- Disable right-clicks (but will not work with the tech-savvy)
- While not legally required, copyright noticed and website terms of use on your own sites can be a deterrent
- Register copyright in commercially important works that might get infringed so you have your registration in advance of litigation
What exactly are the ownership rules of the social media / blog sites like Facebook, Twitter and Wordpress?
As of writing:
- You own your content on Twitter and Wordpress
- Facebook has a license to all your content until your account is deleted, unless any content is shared with friends
- Pinterest has a perpetual, worldwide license to your content
I have a few older design projects from school where I don't know where I found the images, and they are currently online. If I wrote a sentence saying it is student work, is this enough?
Unfortunately, no. There is no copyright infringement exception in that case.